Wednesday, 9 November 2011
Your thoughts
I have compiled some 200 odd systems (all profitable) and would like your comments. Is it better to have more selections, obtaining a higher profit year in year out OR less selections, higher strike rate and a lower profit? The difference is around double the horses (if using all systems) with a profit of 5000 points per year (yep FIVE thousand) as opposed to a profit of around 2 - 3,000 points? BIGGGG figures, HUGE profits whichever method I decide on....... P.S Please don't ask for the systems (all from the analyser) although if you have a spare 2 million I might be tempted to share them ... I am though, willing to email say 3 or 4 systems. You'll need my email from Bob though...........
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Martin knows my opinion on systems - my father was a bookmaker who brought up a family of 11 very nicely on money he made from punters with Systems. He had a saying - "They start the season with their systems I end the season with their money"
Saying all that - systems such as staking plans, stop at a winner, - round robins, Lucky 15s' were the ones he loved best - a system that tries to narrow chance to its lowest denominator is not really a system so much as an accountancy practice -
The way to enjoy sport is to watch make notes and back /lay to your own opinions you lose some win some
"but your not trying to catch the moon in a puddle"
Glad to hear you are on the mend - now, systems - they aren't exactly "systems" - that aside, I wanted tour opinions on whether to make more profit, with double the selections (almost) but with longer losing runs pitted against half the profit where the strike rate, number of winners and losing streak is much better
safety first :)
My Dad Made his profit over the year - Nuff said ?
You're Dad didn't have me around!!! More's the pity lol
Post a Comment